Sunday, May 29, 2011

Assignment no. 1- Article Summaries

Article no. 1
Fixed Schedules Can Support 21st Century Skills

In “Fixed Schedules Can Support 21st Century Skills” Formanack and Pietsch state that fixed library schedules can still lead to an effective school library program if there is a strong and committed teacher-librarian in place.  I was drawn to this article because I’m currently thinking about how I want to organize my schedule for next year.  When I first started at my school as a teacher-librarian in September I proposed that the library schedule be flexible since that is what I had experienced in other schools.  The staff did not agree and convinced me to make a fixed schedule at least for the first term.  At first, I was a little reluctant but now as the year comes to an end I have really enjoyed having a fixed schedule for the whole year.  Creating a fixed schedule was a little difficult with all the prep periods and the schedule of other specialists but somehow we managed. 

Formanack and Pietsch reminded me how important it is to be organized and to have a well-developed curriculum.  This is something I lacked this year.  I found it very difficult to meet with teachers to collaborate on lessons due to time constraints.  The article also stresses the importance of building on communication.  Formanack and Pietsch recommend that classroom teachers share their long-term plans with the TLs and that TLs need to “build trusting relationships with classroom teachers and help them understand that library time is an opportunity for their students to extend classroom learning and meet classroom goals”.  I really tried hard this year to do this but it was harder than I expected.  Many teachers jumped on board right away and understood what I was trying to achieve while others, the more experienced teachers, resisted the whole year and even made it difficult for me to do my job.  I can see that I still need to work on building trust and that this will take time.  I also need to develop my curriculum so that they can see how a TL can benefit their curriculum.  Those teachers need evidence that I can serve a purpose. 

I’m fortunate that I have time in my schedule to meet with all the classes once a week to do a lesson.  Someone else takes care of the book exchanges since I only work 3 days a week, by choice.  In many school districts where the TL job keeps getting cut back, it would be difficult to have a fixed schedule.  TLs would have to get creative like perhaps having a schedule over 2 weeks or to divide classes by term. 

To help develop a strong curriculum, the article goes on to talk about establishing professional learning communities (PLCs).  I have been involved in some PLCs in the past and I think that this would be beneficial to me since I’m so new to the position of TL.  The library PLC groups that were described in the article consisted of eight to ten librarians from schools with the similar grade-levels or similar demographics.  They were established to “create effective professional development by examining best practices in the design of teaching and learning experiences.”  The groups would meet monthly and focused on AASL’s Standards for the 21st century Learner.  The group would then reconvene to assess the results and examine student work. The Omaha Public Schools took on this model and found that PLCs “are an effective way to meet with their library colleagues and determine an instructional focus, develop a curriculum-based project, and deliver common instruction.”  I find having this kind of dialogue among colleagues is the richest kind of professional development that I could have at this point.  The PLC group even had seven steps to follow:

-identify and clarify student needs;

-formulate an objective and identify student work to be analyzed;

-identify and adopt an instructional focus to address the need;

-prepare to try the instructional focus in the classroom;

-deliver instruction making consistent and genuine efforts;

-analyze student work to evaluate whether the instruction met student needs;

-reassess. Either repeat the cycle or move to another area of need

I work for the Catholic School Board and feel that creating PLCs could definitely be achieved since we are so small.  We are spread out throughout the Lower Mainland but we could group ourselves geographically.  I look forward to our next TL meeting in the Fall, perhaps I’ll be brave enough to suggest that we start PLCs!

In conclusion it is so important to get to know your students and staff to create an effective schedule.  In my school a fixed schedule seems to be working very well.  A good library program needs to be led by a strong TL.  As Formanack and Pietsch state “those librarians advocate for their programs, foster positive professional relationships at both the building level and within the larger library community and take the lead in learning initiatives”.  Most importantly like in all areas of teaching, there must be evidence to show that library programs are working and are impacting student achievement, this is what will help sell my program to my staff.  I have a lot of work cut out for me next year! 

References:
Formanack, G. and Pietsch, L. (2011).  Fixed Schedules Can Support 21st Century Skills. School Library Monthly, v27 n6 p8.


Article no. 2
Transform Global Literature Circles with Web 2.0
In this article Collins introduces a project using literature circles to help students to discover “unfamiliar cultures, gaining knowledge and understanding of challenges faced by their contemporaries around the world.”  The librarian and classroom teacher chose fiction books with a global focus and used student-centered technology to show their learning.  Their goals were to: “enlighten students about the worldwide community; destroy misconceptions and stereotypes; develop new understanding of cultural differences; evaluate the author’s perspective or purpose.” 
I’m so excited about this article!  In my last article summary I spoke about the importance of curriculum development and finding projects that teachers will get excited about.  This article gives me a great project to do with the grade seven teacher in my school.  I’ve wanted to do a project or an activity that used different kinds of technology and this project does just that.  This comprehensive article gives all the necessary information to easily take on this project.  Collins provides a booklist for the seventh graders and talks about the criteria in selecting a novel.  To help motivate the students Collins recommends using Animoto (http://animoto.com/) to create professional looking video clips.  Instead of doing a typical booktalk she used this with images and sounds to help represent the books.  I think this is a great tool to motivate the students.  I was intrigued by this site and spent way too much time creating my own video using family pictures!   This is a good reminder for me to always have something interesting to start off any project.  With enthusiasm and creativity students will jump right into the activity or project. 
Instead of doing the typical book discussion groups, Collins used Moodle, a closed learning environment, to create an online threaded book discussion.  This is another simple way to integrate technology into a lesson.  Once the students have answered the questions and have discussed thoroughly about their book the next step is doing a global community exchange.  Collins contacted the librarian at the International School of Boston.  She provided contacts to staff members who were from different cultures.  Using Skype, the students asked questions and listened to the different experiences of these global citizens.  Following that, students used Glogs, online posters that integrate text, photos, audio and video, to express the knowledge that they had gained from the book.  The last thing students had to do was complete a self-reflection sheet about the book and about the technology used. 
In conclusion I think this project is a wonderful way to include literacy of the 21st century into the curriculum.  By integrating “Web 2.0 tools into projects, today’s digital natives will become thoroughly engaged.  Curriculum will be more relevant to their lives as they become Web 2.0 savvy global citizen.”
References:
Collins, J. (2010).  Transform Global Literature Circles with Web 2.0.  Library Media Connection, v29 n2 p24-25 Oct 2010. 2 pp.
Article no. 3
School Library Website Components
I’m very interested in creating a school library website.  I was searching for an article that would help me get started.  In Jurkowski’s article he gives a nice overview of the different elements that should be included in a library website.  Jurkowski states that “school websites are a necessity” and I totally agree with him.  I think it’s the role of the librarian to be a leader in technology and what better place to start than in creating a website.  My school doesn’t have any kind of website for the library.  The school website is very informative and is kept up to date with all the information that parents and teachers need.  Every teacher has their own page where they post the daily homework and class schedule.  Since parents and teachers are already used to looking at the school website for information I think that they would find a library website quite useful. 
The first website I ever made was for LIBE 465.  I stuck to the basics and found the process to be quite easy.  Jurkowski mentions that the technical aspects of designing a good website are no longer the biggest problems that librarians face when creating a website.  There are so many great sites that make it very easy for you.  Jurkowski explains that the more difficult hurdle is the actual design and organization of the website.  He also suggests that any school website should be simple and easy to follow.  Librarians don’t need to worry about designing a flashy site.   As long as the site is age appropriate and easy to navigate then the website will be used. 
Jurkowski’s article mainly focuses on the content that a library website should have in terms of information and resources for its users.   During 2003 Jurkowski analyzed 34 school library websites in Missouri.  He provided a list of website features for basic functions, features more specific to a school library, features for content area and additional features that might be worth adding.  I’m sure these lists of features will be very useful when I finally have the time to start working on my website. 
Jurkowski suggests that the best way to decide what to put in the library website is to look at many library websites that are already done.  He recommends incorporating the best into your own.  “Therefore, the more you look, the better representation you can find.”  To start he recommends to first decide what exactly you want to include and do with the website. Something to remember is that websites go through periods of change and you can’t keep the same site for too long without making significant changes.   Something that I’m struggling with and that worries me is the time needed to firstly create the site but then to also maintain it.  It’s so important to keep the site up to date and interesting.  If students can rely on you to introduce new and interesting sites then they will keep coming back to see what is new.  The worst thing would be to create a site that no one uses! 
I look forward to the experience of creating a dynamic library website for my school and incorporating many of Jurkowski’s suggestions. 
References:
Jurkowski, O. (2004) School Library Website Components. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, v48 n6 p56-60 2004. 5 pp.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Lesson 2 -Reflections on Successful Reference Services

In lesson 2 we are asked to reflect on the components of “successful reference services” as outlined in Riedling’s book on pg.4.  There are also three other components that were added to this list in lesson 2.  I think it is reasonable to expect a TL to be able to be competent on all these areas.  It takes time and we cannot expect that a TL will have all these qualities when first starting but these are definitely attainable goals.  When I look over this list I’m happy to see that I have already started making some improvements and become familiar with many of these components.  Below is my reflection on each of them. 

1. Knowledge of the library media collection- I am slowly getting to know my collection of resources.  I haven’t been able to fully analyze all areas of the library collection but I have a rough idea of how well each section is developed.  This is going to take some more time.

2. Effective conversational skills (communication)- Good communication skills are something that I feel pretty confident about especially when dealing with students and parents.  I do find I still have some work to do when communicating with staff members.  I have had to justify myself and my program a few times this year and I think that I need to do a better job.  I don’t think the staff has a clear idea of my goals and mission as a TL.  I assumed that teachers being educators would be able to easily understand what my purpose is in the library but I’ve come to see that I was wrong in assuming this.  Having a TL at my school is a new concept and I still have a lot of educating to do!   Luckily I have a fantastic administrator that supports me in everything I do. 

3. Competence in selecting, acquiring and evaluating resources to meet students’ needs-  This has been a bit of a challenge so far.  Since I don’t have a very good grasp of the entire library collection it’s hard to know what is needed.  I’m lucky to have a healthy budget but knowing where to put that money requires a lot of planning over a number of years.  This year I tried to fill in a few holes but I mostly just bought books that I found interesting.  I found many great resources but I’m not entirely sure if all of the books that I bought were essential at this time.  I will be starting my inventory soon and this will give me a chance to look at and to touch every book in the library.   This should give me a better idea of what my areas of focus should be for next year’s purchases.

4. Understanding of the research process and the affective qualities that are inherent in research- I have started working on research models this year and I plan on presenting a couple of them to the staff to try and have one model used throughout the grades.  This course so far has provided me with some good information about the different types of models.

5. Patience with the frustrations that often accompany reference services and an ability to stay positive despite these- I see myself as being a very patient person however this year my patience has been tested.  My reference section is minimal and I don’t even have computers yet to help students do research online.  I’ve been told that the computers are coming… I’ve also been frustrated by the lack of knowledge that the students have about how to research and about the library.  I’m trying to stay positive and see that everything takes time especially when there are many changes to be made. 

6. Knowledge of and an eagerness to apply information skills, where applicable, to all levels of student research- For this section, I’m definitely eager to apply these skills but I don’t have enough knowledge yet.  This is where patience is important!  As I journey through the diploma program I hope to gain all the necessary information to feel confident in teaching information skills to all grade levels.

This posting is a little longer than expected!  I found it really interesting to go through each section and to see just how much I have accomplished this year and how much more I need to learn!    All of these components depend on the other.  As long as I keep working a little bit on all the components I will be doing a pretty good job helping out the students and staff at my school….for a rookie of course!

Module 1 Lesson 2- Research Models

After working with the intermediate classes, I realized pretty early on in the year that I would need to start teaching a research model.  I first heard about them in LIBE 461.  Without doing too much research, I decided to introduce the Big6 model.  I worked mainly with the gr. 5 class and found that they were quite keen on learning about this model.  The name ‘Big6’ caught their attention right away and has helped them remember the steps.  At first, explaining the steps was a little confusing for them but I focused more on the questions that go with each step as Ben outlined in his posting.  After having gone over the steps I gave them a handout to help them with their project.  Once in a while I quiz them to see if they remember the steps and they do.  They don’t use the same language but they are able to explain each step.  Due to time constraints I haven’t been able to go over every step in depth but at least they have an idea of the process.  Next year I can always build on the base that they have.

I think that all of the models are good in their own way. As others have stated what is important is consistency across the grades.   As a whole, the staff needs to agree on the one that makes the most sense to them and for their student population and use it in their class on a regular basis.  This cannot only be the responsibility of the TL.  I see all the classes once a week for a lesson of some kind but being a French Immersion school I need to juggle two programs.  One week a teach something in English such as an author study or research skills and the following week I do a lesson in French, this year the staff agreed to do Reading Power.  They are two separate and very different programs.  It makes it very hard to teach these concepts when I see them every two weeks.  The teachers need to be going over this in class and expect the students to follow the steps.  Since most projects are done at home, parents should also have access to the steps of the model….maybe a little info night with parents could be useful.

Thanks to Hilary for sharing the BCTLA Points of Inquiry model.  I looked through it quickly and it looks really interesting.  I like how each step is broken down by grade and by Inquiry-based reading and learning.  I also like the wording used for the steps, in particular 'Connect and Wonder'.  Like Hilary said, often students don't even fully understand the research question and how to break it down into manageable chunks.  Taking the time to make connections and fully explore the topic before even looking for resources is a very important step that is often overlooked.  I think that my teachers would go for this model if I presented the entire document.  It’s clearly laid out and its BC made. I don’t think it will be hard to switch to a new model after introducing the Big6.  The process is almost the same so it’s just a matter of teaching the new language….the Big5?!